Mis establos!!!

None of the science or medical information I might post to this blog should be taken as medical advice (I'm not medically trained). Think of this blog as a sort of nursery for my half-baked ideas hence 'stuff that occurs to me'.

I work on the EPSRC-funded @CHI_MED project; all views are my own. I used to work at Diabetes UK (until 22 June 2012) as a Science Information Officer (effectively a science-specialist librarian but not quite a clinical librarian). Before that it was ScienceLine and back in the mists of time it was lipid chemistry & neuroscience.

Contact: @JoBrodie or reconfigure this email address me.meeeee @ gmail.com (replace me and meeeee with obvious letters, eg... jo.brodie@ etc).

Oh OK then it's jo dot brodie at gmail dot com

Saturday, 18 February 2012

Twitter spam followers - is it getting a bit out of hand?

I'm not sure if I'm more troubled by spam followers than anyone else but it seems that I'm dealing with a handful of them every day (recently it was 15 in a one hour period once, but that's rare) and have lost count of them (it feels like it's comfortably over 100 of them). They all seem to have a similar format which makes me think that someone with better coding skills than me could probably rustle up some sort of script type thing to block them.

For a short while I protected my tweets (this means that anyone wishing to follow you must send a request which you can allow or block - and it's so much quicker to block spammers this way, fewer buttons to click) but I want my tweets to be public. Ideally my stream would be visible to everyone but people would additionally have to send a request to be able to follow (ie to receive your tweets in their timeline) and at the moment I don't think you can do that.

In the days of IRC (internet relay chat) it was easy to block people by using a line of text that recognised one or more aspects of their email address or username and would activate a 'deny' whenever they tried to join a channel. There's a good example on this page of how to do an IRC channel ban bearing in mind that people can change their username, or nickname and amend bits of their hostname.

Surely setting up something conceptually similarish to block anyone who - in these cases - has a username with X1758 (X and four numbers) and f*** in their bio (it's usually "I like to f***" or "I'm going to f***ing destroy you") is possible? They could then be flagged up as likely blocks for checking by whoever wants to do this. While most people probably don't use swearwords in their Twitter bio it's possible some do and this doesn't mean I don't want them to follow me but the combination of f*** and the X1234 style does seem to be a strong predictor for them being a spam account.

I have no idea what these spammers are hoping to do - perhaps I should follow one to find out... I am now following Carlita, let's see what happens.

Carlita is one of many Twitter users who shares the same bio and style of username. I don't think they post much either.
What I really don't understand is why Twitter hasn't set up something to catch these identikit spammers at source, they're not exactly helping my user experience.

5 comments:

  1. 1. Swearing in bio
    2. Girl's name
    3. Photo of girl
    4. X1234 style of username
    5. Disparity between followers and followees
    6. Tweet count of zero

    Individually pretty harmless, but when combined... seems spammy ;)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Although I'm finding they are getting more clever with lots of tweets, followers & normal user names. However usually combined with a nasty URL.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have the same issue. At first I would laugh it off but now it's getting annoying.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have a worse problem - I appear to have been assigned someone else's fake followers, all 26,000 of them! (I've blogged about it here: http://wp.me/pf1R0-2ow )

    Twitter clearly isn't interested in suspending these phony accounts, otherwise I wouldn't need to block them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I came here when I was looking out for solutions to the problem. I have 100+ new fake accounts following me everyday and locking the account is painful. Twitter needs to separate locking the account and keeping the tweets private.

    ReplyDelete

Comment policy: I enthusiastically welcome corrections and I entertain polite disagreement ;) Because of the nature of this blog it attracts a LOT - 5 a day at the moment - of spam comments (I write about spam practices,misleading marketing and unevidenced quackery) and so I'm more likely to post a pasted version of your comment, removing any hyperlinks.

Comments written in ALL CAPS LOCK will be deleted and I won't publish any pro-homeopathy comments, that ship has sailed I'm afraid (it's nonsense).